Store per-page paragraph indices in section cache to enable precise
XPath-to-page and page-to-XPath mapping without reparsing XHTML.
Forward path (upload): generates XPath directly from paragraph LUT
instead of byte-offset estimation, eliminating drift in chapters
with non-uniform content density.
Reverse path (download): resolves incoming KOReader XPath p[N] to
the exact page via paragraph LUT lookup.
Paragraph counter counts all <p> elements including display:none
to match ChapterXPathIndexer and crengine's standard XPath counting.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
* **What is the goal of this PR?** (e.g., Implements the new feature for
file uploading.)
- Implements auto page turn feature for epub reader in the reader
submenu
* **What changes are included?**
- added auto page turn feature in epub reader in the submenu
- currently there are 5 settings, `OFF, 1, 3, 6, 12` pages per minute
## Additional Context
* Add any other information that might be helpful for the reviewer
(e.g., performance implications, potential risks,
specific areas to focus on).
- Replacement PR for #723
- when auto turn is enabled, space reserved for chapter title will be
used to indicate auto page turn being active
- Back and Confirm button is used to disable it
---
### AI Usage
While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing,
please be transparent about their usage as it
helps set the right context for reviewers.
Did you use AI tools to help write this code? _**Partially (mainly code
reviews)**_
## Summary
Ref comment:
https://github.com/crosspoint-reader/crosspoint-reader/pull/1010#pullrequestreview-3828854640
This PR introduces `ActivityManager`, which mirrors the same concept of
Activity in Android, where an activity represents a single screen of the
UI. The manager is responsible for launching activities, and ensuring
that only one activity is active at a time.
Main differences from Android's ActivityManager:
- No concept of Bundle or Intent extras
- No onPause/onResume, since we don't have a concept of background
activities
- onActivityResult is implemented via a callback instead of a separate
method, for simplicity
## Key changes
- Single `renderTask` shared across all activities
- No more sub-activity, we manage them using a stack; Results can be
passed via `startActivityForResult` and `setResult`
- Activity can call `finish()` to destroy themself, but the actual
deletion will be handled by `ActivityManager` to avoid `delete this`
pattern
As a bonus: the manager will automatically call `requestUpdate()` when
returning from another activity
## Example usage
**BEFORE**:
```cpp
// caller
enterNewActivity(new WifiSelectionActivity(renderer, mappedInput,
[this](const bool connected) { onWifiSelectionComplete(connected); }));
// subactivity
onComplete(true); // will eventually call exitActivity(), which deletes the caller instance (dangerous behavior)
```
**AFTER**: (mirrors the `startActivityForResult` and `setResult` from
android)
```cpp
// caller
startActivityForResult(new NetworkModeSelectionActivity(renderer, mappedInput),
[this](const ActivityResult& result) { onNetworkModeSelected(result.selectedNetworkMode); });
// subactivity
ActivityResult result;
result.isCancelled = false;
result.selectedNetworkMode = mode;
setResult(result);
finish(); // signals to ActivityManager to go back to last activity AFTER this function returns
```
TODO:
- [x] Reconsider if the `Intent` is really necessary or it should be
removed (note: it's inspired by
[Intent](https://developer.android.com/guide/components/intents-common)
from Android API) ==> I decided to keep this pattern fr clarity
- [x] Verify if behavior is still correct (i.e. back from sub-activity)
- [x] Refactor the `ActivityWithSubactivity` to just simple `Activity`
--> We are using a stack for keeping track of sub-activity now
- [x] Use single task for rendering --> avoid allocating 8KB stack per
activity
- [x] Implement the idea of [Activity
result](https://developer.android.com/training/basics/intents/result)
--> Allow sub-activity like Wifi to report back the status (connected,
failed, etc)
---
### AI Usage
While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing,
please be transparent about their usage as it
helps set the right context for reviewers.
Did you use AI tools to help write this code? **PARTIALLY**, some
repetitive migrations are done by Claude, but I'm the one how ultimately
approve it
---------
Co-authored-by: Zach Nelson <zach@zdnelson.com>
