a03d232dd3248522c8c203abf650c11ed92a56ed
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Xuan-Son NguyenandZach Nelson
|
a94f6ca80b |
refactor: implement ActivityManager (#1016)
## Summary Ref comment: https://github.com/crosspoint-reader/crosspoint-reader/pull/1010#pullrequestreview-3828854640 This PR introduces `ActivityManager`, which mirrors the same concept of Activity in Android, where an activity represents a single screen of the UI. The manager is responsible for launching activities, and ensuring that only one activity is active at a time. Main differences from Android's ActivityManager: - No concept of Bundle or Intent extras - No onPause/onResume, since we don't have a concept of background activities - onActivityResult is implemented via a callback instead of a separate method, for simplicity ## Key changes - Single `renderTask` shared across all activities - No more sub-activity, we manage them using a stack; Results can be passed via `startActivityForResult` and `setResult` - Activity can call `finish()` to destroy themself, but the actual deletion will be handled by `ActivityManager` to avoid `delete this` pattern As a bonus: the manager will automatically call `requestUpdate()` when returning from another activity ## Example usage **BEFORE**: ```cpp // caller enterNewActivity(new WifiSelectionActivity(renderer, mappedInput, [this](const bool connected) { onWifiSelectionComplete(connected); })); // subactivity onComplete(true); // will eventually call exitActivity(), which deletes the caller instance (dangerous behavior) ``` **AFTER**: (mirrors the `startActivityForResult` and `setResult` from android) ```cpp // caller startActivityForResult(new NetworkModeSelectionActivity(renderer, mappedInput), [this](const ActivityResult& result) { onNetworkModeSelected(result.selectedNetworkMode); }); // subactivity ActivityResult result; result.isCancelled = false; result.selectedNetworkMode = mode; setResult(result); finish(); // signals to ActivityManager to go back to last activity AFTER this function returns ``` TODO: - [x] Reconsider if the `Intent` is really necessary or it should be removed (note: it's inspired by [Intent](https://developer.android.com/guide/components/intents-common) from Android API) ==> I decided to keep this pattern fr clarity - [x] Verify if behavior is still correct (i.e. back from sub-activity) - [x] Refactor the `ActivityWithSubactivity` to just simple `Activity` --> We are using a stack for keeping track of sub-activity now - [x] Use single task for rendering --> avoid allocating 8KB stack per activity - [x] Implement the idea of [Activity result](https://developer.android.com/training/basics/intents/result) --> Allow sub-activity like Wifi to report back the status (connected, failed, etc) --- ### AI Usage While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing, please be transparent about their usage as it helps set the right context for reviewers. Did you use AI tools to help write this code? **PARTIALLY**, some repetitive migrations are done by Claude, but I'm the one how ultimately approve it --------- Co-authored-by: Zach Nelson <zach@zdnelson.com> |
||
|
Xuan-Son Nguyenandznelson
|
d501d31e02 |
refactor: move render() to Activity super class, use freeRTOS notification (#774)
## Summary Currently, each activity has to manage their own `displayTaskLoop` which adds redundant boilerplate code. The loop is a wait loop which is also not the best practice, as the `updateRequested` boolean is not protected by a mutex. In this PR: - Move `displayTaskLoop` to the super `Activity` class - Replace `updateRequested` with freeRTOS's [direct to task notification](https://www.freertos.org/Documentation/02-Kernel/02-Kernel-features/03-Direct-to-task-notifications/01-Task-notifications) - For `ActivityWithSubactivity`, whenever a sub-activity is present, the parent's `render()` automatically goes inactive With this change, activities now only need to expose `render()` function, and anywhere in the code base can call `requestUpdate()` to request a new rendering pass. ## Additional Context In theory, this change may also make the battery life a bit better, since one wait loop is removed. Although the equipment in my home lab wasn't been able to verify it (the electric current is too noisy and small). Would appreciate if anyone has any insights on this subject. Update: I managed to hack [a small piece of code](https://github.com/ngxson/crosspoint-reader/tree/xsn/measure_cpu_usage) that allow tracking CPU idle time. The CPU load does decrease a bit (1.47% down to 1.39%), which make sense, because the display task is now sleeping most of the time unless notified. This should translate to a slightly increase in battery life in the long run. ``` PR: [40012] [MEM] Free: 185856 bytes, Total: 231004 bytes, Min Free: 123316 bytes [40012] [IDLE] Idle time: 98.61% (CPU load: 1.39%) [50017] [MEM] Free: 185856 bytes, Total: 231004 bytes, Min Free: 123316 bytes [50017] [IDLE] Idle time: 98.61% (CPU load: 1.39%) [60022] [MEM] Free: 185856 bytes, Total: 231004 bytes, Min Free: 123316 bytes [60022] [IDLE] Idle time: 98.61% (CPU load: 1.39%) master: [20012] [MEM] Free: 195016 bytes, Total: 231532 bytes, Min Free: 132460 bytes [20012] [IDLE] Idle time: 98.53% (CPU load: 1.47%) [30017] [MEM] Free: 195016 bytes, Total: 231532 bytes, Min Free: 132460 bytes [30017] [IDLE] Idle time: 98.53% (CPU load: 1.47%) [40022] [MEM] Free: 195016 bytes, Total: 231532 bytes, Min Free: 132460 bytes [40022] [IDLE] Idle time: 98.53% (CPU load: 1.47%) ``` --- ### AI Usage While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing, please be transparent about their usage as it helps set the right context for reviewers. Did you use AI tools to help write this code? **NO** <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Refactor** * Streamlined rendering architecture by consolidating update mechanisms across all activities, improving efficiency and consistency. * Modernized synchronization patterns for display updates to ensure reliable, conflict-free rendering. * **Bug Fixes** * Enhanced rendering stability through improved locking mechanisms and explicit update requests. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: znelson <znelson@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Istiak TridipandDave Allie
|
d7edb4653e |
feat: unify navigation handling with system-wide continuous navigation (#600)
This PR unifies navigation handling & adds system-wide support for continuous navigation. ## Summary Holding down a navigation button now continuously advances through items until the button is released. This removes the need for repeated press-and-release actions and makes navigation faster and smoother, especially in long menus or documents. When page-based navigation is available, it will navigate through pages. If not, it will progress through menu items or similar list-based UI elements. Additionally, this PR fixes inconsistencies in wrap-around behavior and navigation index calculations. Places where the navigation system was updated: - Home Page - Settings Pages - My Library Page - WiFi Selection Page - OPDS Browser Page - Keyboard - File Transfer Page - XTC Chapter Selector Page - EPUB Chapter Selector Page I’ve tested this on the device as much as possible and tried to match the existing behavior. Please let me know if I missed anything. Thanks 🙏  --- Following the request from @osteotek and @daveallie for system-wide support, the old PR (#379) has been closed in favor of this consolidated, system-wide implementation. --- ### AI Usage Did you use AI tools to help write this code? _**PARTIALLY**_ --------- Co-authored-by: Dave Allie <dave@daveallie.com> |
||
|
Sam Davis
|
60492609f1 |
Add chapter select support to XTC files (#145)
## Summary - **What is the goal of this PR?** Add chapter selection support to the XTC reader activity, including parsing chapter metadata from XTC files. - **What changes are included?** Implemented XTC chapter parsing and exposure in the XTC library, added a chapter selection activity for XTC, integrated it into XtcReaderActivity, and normalized chapter page indices by shifting them to 0-based. ## Additional Context - The reader uses 0-based page indexing (first page = 0), but the XTC chapter table appears to be 1-based (first page = 1), so chapter start/end pages are shifted down by 1 during parsing. |