Adds HAL-level support for the Xteink X3 (SSD1677 controller, 792x528
display). Includes device detection, display initialization, button
mapping, power management, and theme adjustments for the X3 form factor.
gpio_hold_en(GPIO13) called in startDeepSleep() persists after wake when
keepClockAlive=true. A subsequent startDeepSleep() call (e.g. failed button
verification) would silently fail to change GPIO13's level, leaving the MOSFET
latched and trapping the device in a sleep/wake loop requiring a hardware reset.
Release the individual and global holds at the top of startDeepSleep() so each
sleep entry configures GPIO13 from a clean state. Also call
gpio_deep_sleep_hold_dis() immediately after wake in setup() as a defensive
measure.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
Fixes#1263
I spent half of my day(-off) reverse engineering the stock english
firmware V3.1.1, it's more or less like solving a sudoku with some known
pieces (like debug strings, known static addresses, known compiled
function, etc) and then the task is to guess the rest.
Long story short, this is the sleep routine that they use:
<img width="674" height="604" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6d53ce44-7bae-40c7-b4fb-24f898dbcc05"
/>
From the code above:
- They pull down GPIO13 (value = 0xd) before sleep
- They verify that power button is released by doing a delay loop of
50ms, similar to what we're doing
- `esp_sleep_config_gpio_isolate` is called but I'm not 100% sure why
- Pull up power button, note that it's likely redundant because power
button should already pulled up by `InputManager`
- `param1` and `param2` means enabling front/side buttons for wake up,
but it doesn't used in the code in reality. But I think it's physically
impossible, see the explanation below
- `param3` means "wake up from power button"
- `esp_sleep_start` is used; there is a logic to handle if it fails to
sleep, then retry recursively (no idea why!)
My observation is that they use GPIO13 so that it will be on HIGH state
when the chip is powered on, without any user space code to keep it on
that state. And once going to deep sleep, it goes into FLOATING by
default. That may explain why it need to be in LOW state before going to
sleep. (Nice trick btw)
Looking again at the circuit diagram provided
[here](https://github.com/sunwoods/Xteink-X4/blob/main/readme-img/sch.jpg)
(note: it's not official):
<img width="705" height="384" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b98d59fd-47ca-4d3d-a24a-94bf999e957b"
/>
It kinda make sense as the GPIO13 and VBUS (USB VCC) have the same role,
they are part of a simple "battery protection" cirtuit
Now, we may wonder, how the device wake up when there is no battery at
all?
<img width="440" height="323" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2981c411-239b-49a7-b9f7-9a75b6c1b6d3"
/>
It seems like power button is not just a simple switch between GPIO3 and
ground, but it also linked the POWER_CTRL, which leads to nowhere on the
diagram, but I suppose it connects the battery back for a short amount
of time, just enough for the MCU to wake up, and GPIO13 goes HIGH again.
It may also explain why power button becomes non-responsive for ~1
second after power on, as it's being pulled up by the current from
battery (remind: high = not pressed, low = pressed)
To test the theory above, I simply **comment out** the
`esp_deep_sleep_enable_gpio_wakeup`:
- On battery, power button works as nothing happen
- On USB, it doesn't wake up, I need to press RST
---
Important things about my analysis:
1. I had to name every function on the code above **manually**, but I'm
99% confident about it. The only function that I'm not sure is
`esp_wifi_bt_power_domain_off` ; Edit: it was indeed mislabeled, see
https://github.com/crosspoint-reader/crosspoint-reader/pull/1298#discussion_r2879670852
2. Some logic inside the stock firmware looks very strange, there is
almost no mention to "arduino" in the hardware, suggesting that they may
just call esp-idf functions directly, bypassing the arduino abstraction.
---
### AI Usage
While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing,
please be transparent about their usage as it
helps set the right context for reviewers.
Did you use AI tools to help write this code? **NO**
---------
Co-authored-by: Zach Nelson <zach@zdnelson.com>
## Summary
* **What is the goal of this PR?** All praise goes to @didacta for his
PR #537. Just picked up the reviewer comments to contain the changes as
suggested (there was no response for more than 6 weeks, so I wanted to
reanimate this feature).
Just one addition: should recognize usb cable plug ins / retractions and
update the icon immediately
* **What changes are included?**
## Additional Context
see #537
---
### AI Usage
While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing,
please be transparent about their usage as it
helps set the right context for reviewers.
Did you use AI tools to help write this code? _**< NO >**_
## Summary
* **What is the goal of this PR?** On a cold boot (or after a crash that
corrupts RTC RAM), logHead contains garbage. Then addToLogRingBuffer
does: ``strncpy(logMessages[logHead], message, MAX_ENTRY_LEN - 1); ``
With garbage logHead, this computes a completely invalid address. The %
MAX_LOG_LINES guard on line 16 only runs after the bad store, which is
too late. The fix is to clamp logHead before use.
## Additional Context
* Add any other information that might be helpful for the reviewer
(e.g., performance implications, potential risks,
specific areas to focus on).
---
### AI Usage
While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing,
please be transparent about their usage as it
helps set the right context for reviewers.
Did you use AI tools to help write this code? _**NO**_ (did use claude
for the magic hash value)
## Summary
Follow-up
https://github.com/crosspoint-reader/crosspoint-reader/pull/1145
- Fix log not being record without USB connected
- Bump release log to INFO for more logging details
---
### AI Usage
While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing,
please be transparent about their usage as it
helps set the right context for reviewers.
Did you use AI tools to help write this code? **NO**
---------
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Fix https://github.com/crosspoint-reader/crosspoint-reader/issues/1137
Introducing `HalFile`, a thin wrapper around `FsFile` that uses a global
mutex to protect file operations.
To test this PR, place the code below somewhere in the code base (I
placed it in `onGoToRecentBooks`)
```cpp
static auto testTask = [](void* param) {
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
String json = Storage.readFile("/.crosspoint/settings.json");
LOG_DBG("TEST_TASK", "Read settings.json, bytes read: %u", json.length());
}
vTaskDelete(nullptr);
};
xTaskCreate(testTask, "test0", 8192, nullptr, 1, nullptr);
xTaskCreate(testTask, "test1", 8192, nullptr, 1, nullptr);
xTaskCreate(testTask, "test2", 8192, nullptr, 1, nullptr);
xTaskCreate(testTask, "test3", 8192, nullptr, 1, nullptr);
delay(1000);
```
It will reliably lead to crash on `master`, but will function correctly
with this PR.
A macro renaming trick is used to avoid changing too many downstream
code files.
---
### AI Usage
While CrossPoint doesn't have restrictions on AI tools in contributing,
please be transparent about their usage as it
helps set the right context for reviewers.
Did you use AI tools to help write this code? **PARTIALLY**, only to
help with tedious copy-paste tasks
---------
Co-authored-by: Zach Nelson <zach@zdnelson.com>
jpirnay
